Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Mar 14 2025 - 07:04:19 EST

Next message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear latched interrupt status when changing IRQ type"
Previous message: Uros Bizjak: "Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Use asm_inline() instead of asm() in amd_clear_divider()"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 6:24 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> a40b63c773c2 ("Merge branch 'devel' into for-next")
>
> Each of the parents of that commit has only one definition, so something
> went wrong with the merge :-(

Yeah it's a tricky one. I dread I have to send this to Torvalds like this...
I hope I fixed it now.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Next message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Clear latched interrupt status when changing IRQ type"
Previous message: Uros Bizjak: "Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Use asm_inline() instead of asm() in amd_clear_divider()"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]