Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 08/14] net: enetc: add RSS support for i.MX95 ENETC PF

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 06:47:11AM +0200, Wei Fang wrote:
> > These rxnfc commands seem implemented identically to the corresponding
> > subset from enetc_get_rxnfc(). Rather than duplicating those, could you
> > rather return -EOPNOTSUPP for the unsupported ones on NETC v4, and reuse
> > enetc_get_rxnfc()?
> > 
> 
> I have explained it to Jakub in v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/PAXPR04MB8510B52B7D27640C557680B4881A2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> So I don't want to reuse it for ENETC v4 PF.

A detail of the review process, written in Documentation/process/6.Followthrough.rst,
is that "Andrew Morton has suggested that every review comment which does
not result in a code change should result in an additional code comment
instead; that can help future reviewers avoid the questions which came
up the first time around."

[ personal mention: it doesn't have to be a code comment but can also be
  a sentence in the commit message ]

I believe that it would be good if you could apply that suggestion for
future submissions (not only for this particular comment).