RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 08/14] net: enetc: add RSS support for i.MX95 ENETC PF

[Wei Fang]

> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 06:47:11AM +0200, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > These rxnfc commands seem implemented identically to the corresponding
> > > subset from enetc_get_rxnfc(). Rather than duplicating those, could you
> > > rather return -EOPNOTSUPP for the unsupported ones on NETC v4, and
> reuse
> > > enetc_get_rxnfc()?
> > >
> >
> > I have explained it to Jakub in v2:
> >
> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/PAXPR04MB8510B52B7D27640C557680B4881A2
> @PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com/
> >
> > So I don't want to reuse it for ENETC v4 PF.
> 
> A detail of the review process, written in
> Documentation/process/6.Followthrough.rst,
> is that "Andrew Morton has suggested that every review comment which does
> not result in a code change should result in an additional code comment
> instead; that can help future reviewers avoid the questions which came
> up the first time around."
> 
> [ personal mention: it doesn't have to be a code comment but can also be
>   a sentence in the commit message ]
> 
> I believe that it would be good if you could apply that suggestion for
> future submissions (not only for this particular comment).

Okay, good to know this info, I will add a comments here.