Re: [RFC 3/5] mm/memcontrol: do not scan anon pages if memsw limit is hit

From: Shakeel Butt
Date: Wed Mar 19 2025 - 15:38:11 EST


On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:41:46PM +0800, Jingxiang Zeng wrote:
> From: Zeng Jingxiang <linuszeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When memory recycling is triggered by the hard watermark of

What is hard watermark?

> memsw, anonymous pages do not want to be recycled any further.
> This is consistent with the processing method of cgroup v2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Jingxiang <linuszeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Is this patch orthogonal to the series or is it needed for v1 as well?

> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index c1171fb2bfd6..623ebf610946 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5072,14 +5072,21 @@ void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned int nr_pages)
>
> long mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> + struct page_counter *pg_counter;
> long nr_swap_pages = get_nr_swap_pages();
>
> - if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || do_memsw_account())
> + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return nr_swap_pages;
> - for (; !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg); memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))
> + for (; !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg); memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) {
> + if (do_memsw_account())
> + pg_counter = &memcg->memsw;
> + else
> + pg_counter = &memcg->swap;
> +
> nr_swap_pages = min_t(long, nr_swap_pages,
> - READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max) -
> - page_counter_read(&memcg->swap));
> + READ_ONCE(pg_counter->max) -
> + page_counter_read(pg_counter));
> + }
> return nr_swap_pages;
> }
>
> --
> 2.41.1
>