Re: [PATCH] perf tests switch-tracking: Fix timestamp comparison

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Tue Apr 01 2025 - 15:54:32 EST


On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 2:14 AM Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:18:31PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm reminded of a Java check I wrote for this:
>
> Nice short article.
>
> > In clang -Wshorten-64-to-32 looks to cover this. I'll see if we can
> > clean those warnings up a bit.
>
> I checked a bit and seems GCC has no this flag, but it makes sense for
> me to enable the flag for Clang.
>
> > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks a lot, Ian.

I made a small variation to the change in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250401182347.3422199-10-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/
to avoid a subtract and just directly compare the values.

Thanks,
Ian

> Leo