Re: [PATCH v2 14/19] mtd: spinand: Use more specific naming for the (quad) program load op

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 4/3/25 10:19 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
> implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
> quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
> naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
> and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
> 
> Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
> topology in the (quad) program load macro name.
> 
> While at modifying it, better add the missing_ OP suffix to align with
> all the other macros of the same kind.
> 
> Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>

I don't remember giving R-b on this, not seeing it on ml as well, so
please drop it when applying.

I used Acked-by and not R-b because I wanted to signify that I'm OK with
the general idea of the patches and that I'm OK with them landing, but I
may not have reviewed it as thoroughly as if a Reviewed-by: was
provided. Please use only the tags that I sent. And if by mistake I sent
both A-b and R-b, use just the latter. Thanks!

ta