Re: [PATCH v2] exit: move and extend sched_process_exit() tracepoint

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:54:22 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This feels really fragile, could you please at least add a comment 
> > that points out that this is basically an extension of 
> > sched_process_template, and that it should remain a subset of it, 
> > or something to that end?
> 
> Is there any dependency on this?
> 
> I don't know of any other dependency to why this was a template other than
> to save memory.

Uhm, to state the obvious: to not replicate the same definitions over 
and over again three times times, for 3 scheduler tracepoints that 
share the record format?

Removing just a single sched_process_template use bloats the source and 
adds in potential fragility:

 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

So my request is to please at least add a comment that points the 
reader to the shared record format between sched_process_exit and the 
other two tracepoints.

Thanks,

	Ingo