Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memcg: Don't generate low/min events if either low/min or elow/emin is 0
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Apr 04 2025 - 13:12:45 EST
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:24:34PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
...
> The simple and naive fix of changing the operator to ">", however,
> changes the memory reclaim behavior which can lead to other failures
> as low events are needed to facilitate memory reclaim. So we can't do
> that without some relatively riskier changes in memory reclaim.
I'm doubtful using ">" would change reclaim behavior in a meaningful way and
that'd be more straightforward. What do mm people think?
Thanks.
--
tejun