Re: [v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in get_rate()

[Markus Elfring]

>>>> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?
>
> I agree with Sudeep, the above sentence is completely incomprehensible
> to me

Can any suggestions gain acceptance also for better summary phrases?



>>> This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the
>>> community are doing already.
>> Do you care if the term “null pointer dereference” would be used in consistent ways?
>
> ...this is more comprehensible,

Thanks for another bit of constructive information.


>                                 but again I cannot grasp what's yor advice
> specifically on this commit message.
May the usage of abbreviations be reconsidered once more also for such messages
(in presented update steps)?

Regards,
Markus