Re: [v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in get_rate()

[Sudeep Holla]

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>>> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?
> >
> > I agree with Sudeep, the above sentence is completely incomprehensible
> > to me
> 
> Can any suggestions gain acceptance also for better summary phrases?
> 
> 
> 
> >>> This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the
> >>> community are doing already.
> >> Do you care if the term “null pointer dereference” would be used in consistent ways?
> >
> > ...this is more comprehensible,
> 
> Thanks for another bit of constructive information.
> 
> 
> >                                 but again I cannot grasp what's yor advice
> > specifically on this commit message.
> May the usage of abbreviations be reconsidered once more also for such messages
> (in presented update steps)?
> 

Still can't understand you. Sorry for that. Alternatively, you can do what
I sometimes do: just write the whole commit log as you would expect and see
if that helps. I am sure that helps, so please do that.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep