Re: [PATCH v7 10/13] serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/T2H SCI
From: Greg KH
Date: Mon Apr 14 2025 - 04:58:48 EST
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 07:54:12AM +0000, Thierry Bultel wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: vendredi 11 avril 2025 16:57
> > To: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: thierry.bultel@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wolfram
> > Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/13] serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/T2H SCI
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:29:12PM +0200, Thierry Bultel wrote:
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> > > @@ -231,6 +231,9 @@
> > > /* Sunplus UART */
> > > #define PORT_SUNPLUS 123
> > >
> > > +/* SH-SCI */
> > > +#define PORT_RSCI 124
> >
> > Why do you need to tell userspace about this specific port? Is that a
> > hard requirement that your userspace tools require? If not, please don't
> > export this here.
>
> This point has been discussed with Geert and Wolfram.
> We cannot use PORT_GENERIC for this IP, and adding the new type
> is just keeping consistent with the sh-sci driver.
But, why does userspace need to know this number? And why doesn't
PORT_GENERIC work?
thanks,
greg k-h