Re: [PATCH v3 00/33] Implement kernel-doc in Python

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:17:12AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:49:29AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:01:04AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 09:17:51AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > >> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:30:00PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > >> > >> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> > This changeset contains the kernel-doc.py script to replace the verable
> > >> > >> > kernel-doc originally written in Perl. It replaces the first version and the
> > >> > >> > second series I sent on the top of it.
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> OK, I've applied it, looked at the (minimal) changes in output, and
> > >> > >> concluded that it's good - all this stuff is now in docs-next.  Many
> > >> > >> thanks for doing this!
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> I'm going to hold off on other documentation patches for a day or two
> > >> > >> just in case anything turns up.  But it looks awfully good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This started well, until it becomes a scripts/lib/kdoc.
> > >> > > So, it makes the `make O=...` builds dirty *). Please make sure this doesn't leave
> > >> > > "disgusting turd" )as said by Linus) in the clean tree.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > *) it creates that __pycache__ disaster. And no, .gitignore IS NOT a solution.
> > >> > 
> > >> > If nothing else, "make cleandocs" should clean it up, certainly.
> > >> > 
> > >> > We can also tell CPython to not create that directory at all.  I'll run
> > >> > some tests to see what the effect is on the documentation build times;
> > >> > I'm guessing it will not be huge...
> > >> 
> > >> I do not build documentation at all, it's just a regular code build that leaves
> > >> tree dirty.
> > >> 
> > >> $ python3 --version
> > >> Python 3.13.2
> > >> 
> > >> It's standard Debian testing distribution, no customisation in the code.
> > >> 
> > >> To reproduce.
> > >> 1) I have just done a new build to reduce the churn, so, running make again does nothing;
> > >> 2) The following snippet in shell shows the issue
> > >> 
> > >> $ git clean -xdf
> > >> $ git status --ignored
> > >> On branch ...
> > >> nothing to commit, working tree clean
> > >> 
> > >> $ make LLVM=-19 O=.../out W=1 C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ -j64
> > >> make[1]: Entering directory '...'
> > >>   GEN     Makefile
> > >>   DESCEND objtool
> > >>   CALL    .../scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > >>   INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
> > >> .pylintrc: warning: ignored by one of the .gitignore files
> > >> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#23)
> > >> make[1]: Leaving directory '...'
> > >> 
> > >> $ touch drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > >> 
> > >> $ make LLVM=-19 O=.../out W=1 C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ -j64
> > >> make[1]: Entering directory '...'
> > >>   GEN     Makefile
> > >>   DESCEND objtool
> > >>   CALL    .../scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > >>   INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
> > >> ...
> > >>   OBJCOPY arch/x86/boot/setup.bin
> > >>   BUILD   arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> > >> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#24)
> > >> make[1]: Leaving directory '...'
> > >> 
> > >> $ git status --ignored
> > >> On branch ...
> > >> Untracked files:
> > >>   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
> > >> 	scripts/lib/kdoc/__pycache__/
> > >> 
> > >> nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
> > >
> > > FWIW, I repeated this with removing the O=.../out folder completely, so it's
> > > fully clean build. Still the same issue.
> > >
> > > And it appears at the very beginning of the build. You don't need to wait to
> > > have the kernel to be built actually.
> > 
> > kernel-doc gets run on source files for W=1 builds. See Makefile.build.
> 
> Thanks for the clarification, so we know that it runs and we know that it has
> an issue.

Ideal solution what would I expect is that the cache folder should respect
the given O=... argument, or disabled at all (but I don't think the latter
is what we want as it may slow down the build).


> > >> It's 100% reproducible on my side. I am happy to test any patches to fix this.
> > >> It's really annoying "feature" for `make O=...` builds. Also note that
> > >> theoretically the Git worktree may be located on read-only storage / media
> > >> and this can induce subtle issues.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko