Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: cadence: Add support for NV-DDR interface mode

[Niravkumar L Rabara]

On 24/10/2025 7:16 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > +	if (nand_interface_is_sdr(conf)) {
> > +		const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf);
> > +
> > +		if (IS_ERR(sdr))
> > +			return PTR_ERR(sdr);
> > +
> > +		ret = cadence_nand_setup_sdr_interface(chip, sdr);
> > +	} else {
> > +		if (chipnr < 0)
> > +			return ret;
>
> I still think this is incorrect. The chipnr value shall not be treated
> differently from the SDR path.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl

You are right — the chipnr check should be common, irrespective of SDR 
or NVDDR.

Just to share some background on why I initially added the check only 
for NVDDR:
While enabling NVDDR support, I noticed that the setup_interface() 
callback is invoked once with chipnr = 0 for SDR, but twice for NVDDR — 
first with chipnr = -1 (NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY) and then with chipnr 
= 0.
Because of this difference, I added the check only for the NVDDR path.

After your comment, I rechecked the NAND framework and realized that the 
behavior I observed occurs because NAND flash on my board supports NVDDR 
and the framework first checks for NVDDR mode, followed by SDR.

If the flash supports only SDR, the setup_interface() callback would 
also be called with chipnr = NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY for SDR.

I’ll move the chipnr check before the if() in the v3 patch.

Thanks,
Nirav