Re: [PATCH 1/3] riscv: soc: re-organized allwinner menu

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/11/2025 14:59, revy wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Messages-----
>> From: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent Time: 2025-11-08 19:29:07 (Saturday)
>> To: gaohan@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Paul Walmsley" <pjw@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Albert Ou" <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@xxxxxxxx>, "Rob Herring" <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@xxxxxxxx>, "Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx>, "Samuel Holland" <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yixun Lan" <dlan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Drew Fustini" <fustini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>, "Guodong Xu" <guodong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Haylen Chu" <heylenay@xxxxxxx>, "Joel Stanley" <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sunxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Han Gao" <rabenda.cn@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] riscv: soc: re-organized allwinner menu
>>
>> On 08/11/2025 09:20, gaohan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Han Gao <gaohan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Allwinner currently offers d1(s)/v821/v861/v881 on RISC-V,
>>> using different IPs.
>>>
>>> d1(s): Xuantie C906
>>> v821: Andes A27 + XuanTie E907
>>> v861/v881: XuanTie C907
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Han Gao <gaohan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
>>> index 848e7149e443..7cba5d6ec4c3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
>>> @@ -54,14 +54,26 @@ config SOC_STARFIVE
>>> 	help
>>> 	  This enables support for StarFive SoC platform hardware.
>>>
>>> -config ARCH_SUNXI
>>> -	bool "Allwinner sun20i SoCs"
>>> +menuconfig ARCH_SUNXI
>>> +	bool "Allwinner RISC-V SoCs"
>>> +
>>> +if ARCH_SUNXI
>>> +
>>> +config ARCH_SUNXI_XUANTIE
>>
>>
>> You should not get multiple ARCHs. ARCH is only one. There is also not
>> much rationale in commit msg for that.
> 
> The main goal is to avoid choosing multiple IP addresses for erreta. 
> If using Andes IPs, I don't want to choose XuanTIe (T-Head) ERRETA.

Not explained in commit msg but anyway not a good argument. It is some
sort of micro optimization and you completely miss the point we target
multiarch kernels.

Best regards,
Krzysztof