Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: fpga: stratix10: add support for Agilex5

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 08:28:46PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/11/2025 20:07, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0800, Khairul Anuar Romli wrote:
> >> Agilex5 introduces changes in how reserved memory is mapped and accessed
> >> compared to previous SoC generations. Agilex5 compatible allows stratix10-
> >> FPGA manager driver to handle these changes.
> >>
> >> Fallback is added for driver probe and init that rely on matching of table
> >> and DT node.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Khairul Anuar Romli <khairul.anuar.romli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v4:
> >> 	- Remove redundant "items - enum" as suggested in v3.
> >> 	- Simplify compatible property to use contains instead of oneOf.
> >> 	- Validate fallback and non-fallback DT. Also validate binding with
> >>           dt_binding_check.
> > 
> > What are you doing?? You've been told several times exactly what to do
> > and yet you keep conjuring up completely random different things.
> > Using contains instead of the oneOf construct that was being done before
> > is *not* a simplification, it is functionally different.
> > 
> > NAK. Go do what you were told to do.
> 
> There is no single file with that syntax, so I really do not understand
> why completely different syntax is reasonable for the author :/

There are actually a handful of bindings that do it (14). Some are
probably wrong, others are the generic portions of snps etc IP schemas.
Run this if you wanna quickly see what's what:

rg --multiline "^properties:\n.*compatible:\n.*contains" --context=5

I'd say that about half of them should be enums or const.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature