Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: switch: adg1712: add ADG1712 SPST switch binding

[Conor Dooley]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 04:46:13PM +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for the ADG1712 quad SPST switch.
> 
> The ADG1712 contains four independent single-pole, single-throw (SPST)
> switches, each controlled by a dedicated GPIO pin. While the device
> uses the existing gpio-mux driver infrastructure (as each switch can be
> modeled as a simple 2-state mux), a dedicated binding document is needed
> to provide clear documentation on how to properly represent the ADG1712
> in devicetree, following the pattern of one mux-controller node per
> independent switch.
> 
> The binding references the gpio-mux schema and demonstrates how each of
> the four independent switches should be instantiated as separate
> mux-controller nodes in the devicetree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/switch/adi,adg1712.yaml          | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/switch/adi,adg1712.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/switch/adi,adg1712.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/switch/adi,adg1712.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7de9ec1b7447
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/switch/adi,adg1712.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/switch/adi,adg1712.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Analog Devices ADG1712 quad SPST switch
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  The ADG1712 contains four independent single-pole, single-throw (SPST)
> +  switches controlled by GPIO pins. The device operates with a low-voltage
> +  single supply range from +1.08V to +5.5V or a low-voltage dual supply
> +  range from ±1.08V to ±2.75V.
> +
> +  Datasheet: https://www.analog.com/en/products/adg1712.html
> +
> +select: false

I think this pretty clearly demonstrates that the binding is not
correct.
If these are independent switches as part of one device, they should
probably be represented as child nodes of a node with an adg1712
compatible, similar to how adc channels etc are done.

pw-bot: changes-requested

> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/mux/gpio-mux.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: gpio-mux
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +
> +    /* ADG1712 with four independent switches, each as a 2-state mux */
> +    adg1712_sw1: mux-controller-0 {
> +        compatible = "gpio-mux";
> +        #mux-control-cells = <0>;
> +        mux-gpios = <&gpio 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +        idle-state = <0>;  /* Switch open */
> +    };
> +
> +    adg1712_sw2: mux-controller-1 {
> +        compatible = "gpio-mux";
> +        #mux-control-cells = <0>;
> +        mux-gpios = <&gpio 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +        idle-state = <0>;  /* Switch open */
> +    };
> +
> +    adg1712_sw3: mux-controller-2 {
> +        compatible = "gpio-mux";
> +        #mux-control-cells = <0>;
> +        mux-gpios = <&gpio 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +        idle-state = <1>;  /* Switch closed */
> +    };
> +
> +    adg1712_sw4: mux-controller-3 {
> +        compatible = "gpio-mux";
> +        #mux-control-cells = <0>;
> +        mux-gpios = <&gpio 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +        idle-state = <0>;  /* Switch open */
> +    };
> +...
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature