Re: [PATCH v3 06/22] mm: Always use page table accessor functions
From: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2025 - 15:32:09 EST
On 11/26/25 17:34, Ryan Roberts wrote:
On 26/11/2025 16:07, Ryan Roberts wrote:
On 26/11/2025 15:12, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
On 11/26/25 16:08, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 03:56:13PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
On 11/26/25 15:52, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
Would the pmdp_get() never get invoked then? Or otherwise wouldn't that end up
requiring a READ_ONCE() further up the stack?
See my other reply, I think the pmdp_get() is required because all pud_*
functions are just simple stubs.
OK, thought you were saying we should push further down the stack? Or up
depending on how you view these things :P as in READ_ONCE at leaf?
I think at leaf because I think the previous ones should essentially be only
used by stubs.
But I haven't fully digested how this is all working. Or supposed to work.
I'm trying to chew through the arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h example to
see if I can make sense of it,
I wonder if we can think about this slightly differently;
READ_ONCE() has two important properties:
- It guarrantees that a load will be issued, *even if output is unused*
- It guarrantees that the read will be single-copy-atomic (no tearing)
I think for the existing places where READ_ONCE() is used for pagetable reads we
only care about:
- It guarrantees that a load will be issued, *if output is used*
- It guarrantees that the read will be single-copy-atomic (no tearing)
I think if we can weaken to the "if output is used" property, then the compiler
will optimize out all the unneccessary reads.
AIUI, a C dereference provides neither of the guarrantees so that's no good.
What about non-volatile asm? I'm told (thought need to verify) that for
non-volatile asm, the compiler will emit it if the output is used and remove it
otherwise. So if the asm contains the required single-copy-atomic, perhaps we
are in business?
So we would need a new READ_SCA() macro that could default to READ_ONCE() (which
is stronger) and arches could opt in to providing a weaker asm version. Then the
default pXdp_get() could be READ_SCA(). And this should work for all cases.
I think.
I'm not sure this works. It looks like the compiler is free to move non-volatile
asm sections which might be problematic for places where we are currently using
READ_ONCE() in lockless algorithms, (e.g. GUP?). We wouldn't want to end up with
a stale value.
Another idea:
Given the main pattern where we are aiming to optimize out the read is something
like:
if (!pud_present(*pud))
where for a folded pmd:
static inline int pud_present(pud_t pud) { return 1; }
And we will change it to this:
if (!pud_present(pudp_get(pud)))
...
perhaps we can just define the folded pXd_present(), pXd_none(), pXd_bad(),
pXd_user() and pXd_leaf() as macros:
#define pud_present(pud) 1
Let's take a step back and realize that with __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
(a) *pudp does not make any sense
For a folded PMD, *pudp == *pmdp and consequently we would actually
get a PMD, not a PUD.
For this reason all these pud_* helpers ignore the passed value
completely. It would be wrong.
(b) pmd_offset() does *not* consume a pud but instead a pudp.
That makes sense, just imagine what would happen if someone would pass
*pudp to that helper (we'd dereference twice ...).
So I wonder if we can just teach get_pudp() and friends to ... return
true garbage instead of dereferencing something that does not make sense?
diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
index 32e8457ad5352..c95d0d89ab3f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -351,7 +351,13 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_get(pmd_t *pmdp)
#ifndef pudp_get
static inline pud_t pudp_get(pud_t *pudp)
{
+#ifdef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
+ pud_t dummy = { 0 };
+
+ return dummy;
+#else
return READ_ONCE(*pudp);
+#endif
}
#endif
set_pud/pud_page/pud_pgtable helper are confusing, I would
assume they are essentially unused (like documented for set_put)
and only required to keep compilers happy.
--
Cheers
David