Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Document UFSHC compatible for x1e80100

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Jan 02 2026 - 06:26:16 EST


On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 03:49:49PM +0530, Pradeep P V K wrote:
> Add the UFS Host Controller (UFSHC) compatible for Qualcomm x1e80100
> SoC. Use SM8550 as a fallback since x1e80100 shares compatibility
> with SM8550 UFSHC, enabling reuse of existing support.

Your last sentence is redundant. "Make devices compatible because they
are compatible". Why are they compatible? Or just say that you add a new
device fully compatible with SM8550. Write concise and informative
statements, not long elaborted paragraphs where only few words are the
actual information

>
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml | 38 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
> index d94ef4e6b85a..0f6ea7ca06c8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
> @@ -26,26 +26,34 @@ select:
> - qcom,sm8350-ufshc
> - qcom,sm8450-ufshc
> - qcom,sm8550-ufshc
> + - qcom,x1e80100-ufshc

You don't need this.

> required:
> - compatible

Best regards,
Krzysztof