Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/hugetlb: Enforce brace style
From: SeongJae Park
Date: Thu Jan 15 2026 - 20:54:23 EST
On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:16:12 +0100 "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/15/26 22:14, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 21:10:41 +0100 "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/15/26 19:14, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> >>> Documentation/process/coding-style.rst explicitly notes that if only one
> >>> branch of a conditional statement is a single statement, braces should
> >>> be used in both branches. Enforce this in mm/hugetlb.c.
> >>>
> >>> No functional change intended.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
> >>> return rc;
> >>> @@ -2672,11 +2675,13 @@ void restore_reserve_on_error(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >>> * be consumed on a subsequent allocation.
> >>> */
> >>> folio_set_hugetlb_restore_reserve(folio);
> >>> - } else
> >>> + } else {
> >>> /*
> >>> * No reservation present, do nothing
> >>> */
> >>> vma_end_reservation(h, vma, address);
^ The space here seems unnecessary?
> >>> +
> >>
> >> But why the empty line? :)
> >
> > Hello David,
> >
> > Whoops, I totally forgot to run checkpatch on this one. I think Andrew
> > also noticed this, he sent a fixlet for it. Sorry for this! I'll fix it up
> > in v2.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> with that ;)
Regardless of my finding, but assuming you will fix David's finding ;) please
feel free to add below to the v2.
Reviewed-by: SeongJae PArk <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]