Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] usb: typec: ucsi: ucsi_glink: Add support for X1E80100 compatible string

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Thu Jan 15 2026 - 04:14:57 EST


On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 01:17:58PM -0800, Anjelique Melendez wrote:
> Add support for the X1E80100 compatible string which needs UCSI_DELAY_DEVICE_PDOS quirk.

Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process (neither too early nor over the limit):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597


>
> Signed-off-by: Anjelique Melendez <anjelique.melendez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c
> index 11b3e24e34e2..e700c6a58a46 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pmic_glink_ucsi_of_quirks[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sc8180x, },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sm8450, },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sm8450, },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sm8450, },

So is it compatible with sm8550 or not? Based on this commit it would
be, so you need to clarify here why you decided not to make them
compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof