Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "revocable: Revocable resource management"

[Tzung-Bi Shih]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 03:57:44PM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 06:05:32PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Turns out there are correctness issues with both the gpiolib conversion and
> > the revocable design itself that can lead to use-after-free and hung tasks (see
> > [1] and patch 3/3).
> [...]
> > Revert the revocable implementation until a redesign has been proposed and
> > evaluated properly.
> 
> I'll work on addressing the discovered issues and send follow-up fixes.  I
> believe keeping the current series in linux-next would be beneficial, as it
> allows for easier testing and wider evaluation by others, rather than
> reverting at this stage.

FWIW: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129143733.45618-2-tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx/
and https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129143733.45618-4-tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx/
are the proposed fixes.