Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "revocable: Revocable resource management"

[Danilo Krummrich]

(Cc: Maxime, Thomas, Maarten)

On Thu Jan 29, 2026 at 2:08 AM CET, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> That's what I've been advocating for. The best way to ensure that driver
> code will not accessed data freed at .remove() time is to prevent the
> code to run at all.

With this we are in full agreement, I think that'd be best too. But, I also
think that sometimes this isn't possible. For instance, DRM has such a case with
atomic mode setting.