Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "revocable: Revocable resource management"

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:29:03PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> (Cc: Maxime, Thomas, Maarten)
> 
> On Thu Jan 29, 2026 at 2:08 AM CET, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > That's what I've been advocating for. The best way to ensure that driver
> > code will not accessed data freed at .remove() time is to prevent the
> > code to run at all.
> 
> With this we are in full agreement, I think that'd be best too. But, I also
> think that sometimes this isn't possible. For instance, DRM has such a case with
> atomic mode setting.

I don't see why it would be impossible there.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart