Re: [PATCH] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer.py: define scripts

[Tamir Duberstein]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 12:07 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 10:13 AM Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 2:53 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > It depends on your perspective - I framed it as a fix of the commit
> > > that added the first script because that script was added without RA
> > > support. What do you think?
> >
> > Yeah, I see.
> >
> > So, on the implementation side, I don't think we expected scripts to
> > work at all, which is why it sounds to me like a feature (neither the
> > linked commit nor the one that added rust-analyzer overall support
> > mentions it that I can see, though it doesn't say otherwise either).
> >
> > But perhaps someone out there expected it to actually work and thus
> > may think of it as a fix. I don't recall someone asking for it, but I
> > haven't checked. Perhaps someone would, when we use more and more Rust
> > scripts.
> >
> > Now, for the backport part, according to the official rules, I think
> > it wouldn't fit. But those rules are often relaxed and who knows what
> > companies out there doing out-of-tree work on top of LTS kernels
> > want... (Commits can be submitted there even if they are not fixes, by
> > the way).
>
> Thanks for the context. In that case I'll keep it as a fix and take it
> through rust-analyzer-next with the backport tags since I expect it to
> apply cleanly.
>
> Cheers,
> Tamir

Applied to rust-analyzer-next. Thanks all!