Re: [RFC v2 0/5] md/raid1: introduce a new sync action to repair badblocks

Next message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2-industrial-mezzanine: Add TC9563 PCIe switch nodes"
Previous message: Sun Jian: "[PATCH] netfilter: bpf: add missing declaration for bpf_ct_set_nat_info"
In reply to: Zheng Qixing: "Re: [RFC v2 0/5] md/raid1: introduce a new sync action to repair badblocks"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC v2 0/5] md/raid1: introduce a new sync action to repair badblocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Pascal Hambourg

Date: Tue Feb 03 2026 - 03:47:55 EST

On 03/02/2026 à 08:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Just curious, but what kind of devices do you see that have
permanent bad blocks at a fixed location that are not fixed by
rewriting the sector?

I have seen this with several hard disk drives of various brands, even though SMART attribute #5 (reallocated sector count) had not reached the limit.