Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: lt9611: Support single Port B input

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/02/2026 10:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 11:08 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/02/2026 21:31, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
>>>>> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
>>>>> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
>>>>> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes:
>>>>> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
>>>>> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
>>>>> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@0/port@1,
>>>>>   allowing either port to be used independently
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <rosh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
>>>> completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
>>>> Please perform review in public.
>>>
>>> FYI. v2 was updated per review feedback, which is public:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/7d9041a3-9d2b-469a-9fa7-89d53bbd2a1f@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Link above is not from Roger, so again - where did the review leading to
>> above tag happen?
> 
> Per feedback of v1, v2 was quite different than v1.
> For v2, it's close to initial review, because it looks like a new patch.

Where was the review of v2 given?

The patch is entirely different. I already said it. I also said what is
expected in such case. It is also documented:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577



Best regards,
Krzysztof