Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: lt9611: Support single Port B input
From: Roger Shimizu
Date: Fri Feb 06 2026 - 06:38:45 EST
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 11:08 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2026 21:31, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
> >>> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
> >>> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
> >>> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
> >>>
> >>> Changes:
> >>> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
> >>> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
> >>> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@0/port@1,
> >>> allowing either port to be used independently
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <rosh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
> >> completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
> >> Please perform review in public.
> >
> > FYI. v2 was updated per review feedback, which is public:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/7d9041a3-9d2b-469a-9fa7-89d53bbd2a1f@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Link above is not from Roger, so again - where did the review leading to
> above tag happen?
Per feedback of v1, v2 was quite different than v1.
For v2, it's close to initial review, because it looks like a new patch.
Of course, if you don't like this way, we can drop this next time.
-Roger