Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: mfd: document ASUS Transformer EC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/02/2026 10:37, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> вт, 10 лют. 2026 р. о 11:22 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>> Document embedded controller used in ASUS Transformer device series.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/asus,ec.yaml      | 152 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 152 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/asus,ec.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/asus,ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/asus,ec.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..1d1a62761b71
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/asus,ec.yaml
>>
>> EC do not go to MFD, but to dedicated directory (there is such).
>>
> 
> Noted
> 
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/asus,ec.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: ASUS Transformer's Embedded Controller
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  Several Nuvoton based Embedded Controller attached to an I2C bus,
>>> +  running a custom ASUS firmware, specific to the Asus Transformer
>>> +  device series.
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    oneOf:
>>
>> Drop oneOf
>>
> 
> Noted
> 
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          - asus,ec-pad  # Pad part of Asus Transformer
>>> +          - asus,ec-dock # Dock part of Asus Transformer
>>
>>
>> Compatibles are way too generic. "ec" basically means you document all
>> Asus EC, which is for sure not true. You need specific compatible for
>> this specific model.
>>
> 
> Asus were not so generous to provide more specific data, they call
> there controllers asusdec and asusped in their sources.

Look how other ECs are called. Your device is not "", but e.g.
"Transformer".

> 
>> Missing blank line.
>>
> 
> noted
> 
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  request-gpio:
>>
>> gpio is deprecated. gpios, look at any other binding.
>>
> 
> noted
> 
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  asus,dockram:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> +    description: I2C device used to access power related functions.
>>> +
>>> +  asus,clear-factory-mode:
>>> +    type: boolean
>>> +    description: clear Factory Mode bit in EC control register
>>
>> Why would this be a static/fixed property over lifecycle of all devices?
>>
> 
> Specify pls.

Provide rationale why we need to clear it every time, not once. Or any
other rationale why we would accept that property.


> 
>>> +
>>> +  battery:
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/power/supply/power-supply.yaml
>>> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        const: asus,ec-battery
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - compatible
>>> +
>>> +  charger:
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/power/supply/power-supply.yaml
>>> +    additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        const: asus,ec-charger
>>> +
>>> +      monitored-battery: true
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - compatible
>>> +
>>> +  keyboard-ext:
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    description: top row of multimedia keys
>>> +    additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        const: asus,ec-keys
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - compatible
>>> +
>>> +  led:
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        const: asus,ec-led
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - compatible
>>> +
>>> +  serio:
>>
>> All of these children are pointless - no resources. Drop all of them,
>> it's btw explicitly documented rule in writing bindings.
>>
> 
> They are all needed to be able to disable them individually from the
> device tree if needed.

They should not be disabled from DT, so they are not valid here. The
given EC for given device is fixed/static. Does not change.


Best regards,
Krzysztof