Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: mfd: document ASUS Transformer EC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/02/2026 12:40, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>>
>>> So you propose introduce a compatible for every single ec used in
>>> transformers instead of simply disable unpopulated functions? And how
>>> then battery and charger can reach monitored cell if they have no
>>> dedicated node?
>>
>> Just like for other bindings for nodes without resources, fold into
>> parent. This is already explained in writing bindings, so you could have
>> just read that. I will pass with answering more questions till you read
>> that doc.
>>
> 
> Unfolding asus,ec-pad and asus,ec-dock will result in this list:
> 
> asus,tf101-dock-ec
> asus,tf101g-dock-ec
> asus,sl101-pad-ec
> asus,tf201-pad-ec
> asus,tf201-dock-ec
> asus,tf300t-pad-ec
> asus,tf300t-dock-ec
> asus,tf300tg-pad-ec
> asus,tf300tg-dock-ec
> asus,tf300tl-pad-ec
> asus,tf300tl-dock-ec
> asus,tf600t-pad-ec
> asus,tf700t-pad-ec
> asus,tf700t-dock-ec
> asus,tf701t-pad-ec
> asus,p1801-t-pad-ec
> 
> with minor variations in populated cells. Is this acceptible?


Yes, this looks correct.

Best regards,
Krzysztof