Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: mfd: document ASUS Transformer EC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/02/2026 12:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/02/2026 12:40, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So you propose introduce a compatible for every single ec used in
>>>> transformers instead of simply disable unpopulated functions? And how
>>>> then battery and charger can reach monitored cell if they have no
>>>> dedicated node?
>>>
>>> Just like for other bindings for nodes without resources, fold into
>>> parent. This is already explained in writing bindings, so you could have
>>> just read that. I will pass with answering more questions till you read
>>> that doc.
>>>
>>
>> Unfolding asus,ec-pad and asus,ec-dock will result in this list:
>>
>> asus,tf101-dock-ec
>> asus,tf101g-dock-ec
>> asus,sl101-pad-ec
>> asus,tf201-pad-ec
>> asus,tf201-dock-ec
>> asus,tf300t-pad-ec
>> asus,tf300t-dock-ec
>> asus,tf300tg-pad-ec
>> asus,tf300tg-dock-ec
>> asus,tf300tl-pad-ec
>> asus,tf300tl-dock-ec
>> asus,tf600t-pad-ec
>> asus,tf700t-pad-ec
>> asus,tf700t-dock-ec
>> asus,tf701t-pad-ec
>> asus,p1801-t-pad-ec
>>
>> with minor variations in populated cells. Is this acceptible?
> 
> 
> Yes, this looks correct.

Update: with fallback-expressed compatibility when same interface and/or
superset of features.

Best regards,
Krzysztof