Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add qcom,bcl-hwmon yaml bindings
From: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi
Date: Thu Feb 12 2026 - 15:25:13 EST
Hi Krzysztof,
On 2/6/2026 1:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 02:44:05AM +0530, Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi wrote:Sure, I will update in next revision
Add devicetree binding documentation for Qualcomm PMIC Battery CurrentSubject - You almost hit bingo of what not to do. You miss the third one.
When you hit the bingo, get in touch for a beer.
And before, read the docs, because this was repeated SO MANY TIMES.
ACK
Limiting (BCL) hardware monitor. The BCL hardware provides monitoringDo not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
and alarm functionality for battery overcurrent and battery/system
under voltage conditions.
Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/qcom,bcl-hwmon.yaml | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/qcom,bcl-hwmon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/qcom,bcl-hwmon.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a0e8eaf13eec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/qcom,bcl-hwmon.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/qcom,bcl-hwmon.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm SPMI PMIC Battery Current Limiting (BCL) Hardware Monitor
+
+maintainers:
+ - Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |
ACK
+ SPMI PMIC Battery Current Limiting (BCL) hardware provides monitoring andDrop all bcl fallbacks. Pointless, incorrect and misleading.
+ alarm functionality for battery overcurrent and battery or system under
+ voltage conditions. It monitors battery voltage and current, and
+ can trigger interrupts when configurable thresholds are exceeded.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ oneOf:
+ - description: v1 based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pm7250b-bcl
+ - qcom,pm8250b-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v1
ACK
+I really do not get what you are expressing here but all this is wrong.
+ - description: v2 based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pm8350b-bcl
+ - qcom,pm8350c-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v2
+
+ - description: v3 bmx based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pm8550b-bcl
+ - qcom,pm7550ba-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v3-bmx
+
+ - description: v3 core based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pm8550-bc0l
+ - qcom,pm7550-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v3-core
+
+ - description: v3 wb based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pmw5100-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v3-wb
+
+ - description: v4 bmx based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pmih010-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v4-bmx
+
+ - description: v4 bmx with different scale based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pmv010-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v4-pmv010
+
+ - description: v4 core based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pmh010-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v4-core
+
+ - description: v4 wb based BCL
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,pmw6100-bcl
+ - const: qcom,bcl-v4-wb
+Bus defines it. Drop descrip=tion.
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+ description: BCL base address in the SPMI PMIC register map
ACK
+Drop.
+ interrupts:
+ minItems: 2
ACK
+ maxItems: 2Drop
+ description:
+ BCL alarm interrupts for different threshold levels
ACK
+Drop bcl
+ interrupt-names:
+ items:
+ - const: bcl-max-min
+ - const: bcl-critical
ACK
+No, please read basic guides or presentations about DT bindings. The
+ overcurrent-thresholds-milliamp:
+ description:
+ Current thresholds in milliamperes for the two configurable current
+ alarm levels (max and critical). These values are used to override
+ default thresholds if a platform has different battery ocp specification.
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
suffix already defines this.
My understanding is, it is optional. I will send v2 for internal review.
+ minItems: 2You did not bother to read the docs prior to posting this.
+ maxItems: 2
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - interrupts
+ - interrupt-names
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
You are supposed to do internal review first. Did it happen? I checked
and cannot find anything. It's not acceptable to use the community
instead of your internal review.
NAK
+Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+
+ pmic {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ bcl@1d00 {
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
If you cannot find a name matching your device, please check in kernel
sources for similar cases or you can grow the spec (via pull request to
DT spec repo).
ACK, Will use node name as sensor
Thanks,
Manaf
Best regards,
Krzysztof