Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ICE phandle
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Feb 16 2026 - 06:08:55 EST
On 16/02/2026 12:05, Neeraj Soni wrote:
>
>
> On 2/6/2026 4:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/02/2026 12:20, Neeraj Soni wrote:
>>> Starting with sc7280(kodiak), the ICE will have its own device-tree node.
>>> So add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Co-developed-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Some initial work is done by Abel here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ba3da82d-999b-b040-5230-36e60293e0fd@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>> and by Abhinaba here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009-add-separate-ice-ufs-and-emmc-device-nodes-for-qcs615-platform-v1-1-2a34d8d03c72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>> This patch adds the purpose and usage for phandle in the description and encodes
>>> it properly in the schema.
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
>>> index 938be8228d66..f35b675c9f16 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
>>> @@ -140,6 +140,12 @@ properties:
>>> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> description: platform specific settings for DLL_CONFIG reg.
>>>
>>> + qcom,ice:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> + description: |
>>> + phandle to the Inline Crypto Engine node. ICE having its own platform driver will use this phandle to
>>
>> Please wrap code according to the preferred limit expressed in Kernel
>> coding style (checkpatch is not a coding style description, but only a
>> tool). However don't wrap blindly (see Kernel coding style).
>>
> Sure. While executing dt_binding_check the tool reported max limit as 110 characters so i wrapped
> around it. I will consolidate the description to single line in next patch.
Can you read Linux kernel coding style as I asked?
Best regards,
Krzysztof