Re: [PATCH v3] rust: page: add byte-wise atomic memory copy methods

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 1:00 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's right, valid for reads implies that it's okay to read it.

Great, thanks for confirming.

> valid for atomic reads?

That is the one he suggested, so it is likely to be a good one if two
people thought about it :)

Cheers,
Miguel