Re: [PATCH v3] rust: page: add byte-wise atomic memory copy methods

[Andreas Hindborg]

"Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 1:00 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> That's right, valid for reads implies that it's okay to read it.
>
> Great, thanks for confirming.

Cool, will adjust in next version.

>
>> valid for atomic reads?
>
> That is the one he suggested, so it is likely to be a good one if two
> people thought about it :)

Great, I like it.

This document should be in tree. It's not, is it?


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg