Re: [PATCH] rust: hrtimer: document handle based design rationale

[Andreas Hindborg]

"Boqun Feng" <boqun@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 09:36:04PM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> Add implementation notes explaining why the hrtimer abstraction uses a
>> handle based approach.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for adding this!
>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> However I feel these are not just implementation details. They are the
> design decision we made because of the limitation you mentioned. Maybe
> make them "//!" doc comment and just put them as a separate section that
> describes the necessity of handles? Thoughts?

I don't think these details are important for the reader of the API? If
you just want to use a timer, this is not something you want to read
through.


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg