Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910
From: Rodrigo Alencar
Date: Sun Feb 22 2026 - 05:49:51 EST
On 26/02/21 10:43PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 02:43:02PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> > On 2/20/26 10:46 AM, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > > +dependentSchemas:
> > > + resets:
> > > + properties:
> > > + reset-gpios: false
> > > + reset-gpios:
> > > + properties:
> > > + resets: false
> >
> > This seems too strict. Couldn't we have some resets from a reset
> > controller and others from gpios?
> >
> > Or maybe the reset bindings are enough and we don't need the gpio
> > bindings for the same pin?
>
> Actually, I'd be interested in seeing evidence for the resets property
> ever being used with this device. I think every single reset-controller
> that's currently documented is an on-chip device for resetting
> peripherals.
As mentioned, an FPGA IP as an IIO backend (MMIO platform_device) will
implement the reset controller interface.
--
Kind regards,
Rodrigo Alencar