Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: qcom-cci: Add DT property for SCL clock stretching

[Cory Keitz]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 04:16:31PM +0100, Loic Poulain wrote:
> I'm not convinced this kind of hardware behaviour belongs in
> devicetree. As far as I understand, clock stretching is part of the
> I2C specification, and slaves are allowed to use it whenever they need
> additional time. Masters are therefore expected to tolerate
> stretching. Given that, why not enable it unconditionally in the
> driver? Is there any downside to doing so?

Fair point. I wasn't sure of implications across the platforms, so my
preference was to make the change opt-in to preserve behavior for
existing systems. This is probably an overly-cautious approach though.
I'm happy to submit a v2 that forces it on, and remove the new DT
binding.

Cory