Re: [PATCH 06/10] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8960: add SCM

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 11:46:18AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4/13/26 8:55 PM, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Add the Secure Channel Manager firmware device node to the MSM8960
> > device tree. The SCM is required for secure communication between the
> > application processor and other subsystems.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
> > index 1d5e97b6aa4b..bc3fd55e524a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
> > @@ -77,6 +77,15 @@ l2: l2-cache {
> >  		};
> >  	};
> >  
> > +	firmware {
> > +		scm {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960", "qcom,scm";
> > +
> > +			clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK>;
> 
> I'm wondering if this should be an interconnect resource, but from a
> quick grepping, I think this is always supposed to be @ 64 MHz so
> perhaps not really

I'd say, this matches APQ8064. Let's keep the platform enablement
separate from refactorings, especially for those musem-grade platforms.


Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



> 
> (please tell me if you know more)
> 
> Konrad

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry