Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Document Nord IPCC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/04/2026 10:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4/20/26 10:16 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 12:01:41PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> From: Deepti Jaggi <deepti.jaggi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Document Inter-Processor Communication Controller on Qualcomm Nord SoC
>>> with a fallback on qcom,ipcc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Deepti Jaggi <deepti.jaggi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml
>>> index f5c584cf2146..0a86230a2b18 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.yaml
>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties:
>>>            - qcom,glymur-ipcc
>>>            - qcom,kaanapali-ipcc
>>>            - qcom,milos-ipcc
>>> +          - qcom,nord-ipcc
>>
>> What is the difference between this and the existing 'sa8775p' compatible? Are
>> they both representing the same SoC series?
> 
> Nord is a gen newer

This should be explained somewhere, e.g. in board/soc bindings or SoC ID
bindings. None of these are posted, so most of the patches being posted
could receive that comment - what is the difference and why commit msg
explains nothing.

Best regards,
Krzysztof