Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Revert INVLPGB optimization for set_memory code

[Dave Hansen]

On 4/21/26 11:42, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> Makes sense. And I see the merit in just trying to revert the change. But I
> think a change to fix the optimization is also temptingly small:

Yeah, it is tempting. It's probably what I would have done if this
wasn't easy to revert, or if it wasn't _just_ an optimization.

But once -rc1 hits, we should definitely revisit the optimization.