Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom:: Fix Hawi compatible placement

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Wed Apr 22 2026 - 05:06:54 EST


On 22/04/2026 10:33, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> qcom,hawi-smmu-500 was placed in the wrong enum block of GPU. Move it to
> the correct location alongside other Qualcomm SMMU-500 compatibles for
> CPU.

How could it pass dtbs_check?

>
> Fixes: 5e8323c3d528 ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom: Add compatible for Hawi SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> index 06fb5c8e7547..ba9ad1f5a8ff 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
> - enum:
> - qcom,eliza-smmu-500
> - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> + - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
> - qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500
> - qcom,milos-smmu-500
> - qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
> @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ properties:
> items:
> - enum:
> - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> - - qcom,hawi-smmu-500

No, why? That's for GPU. Why are you moving GPU compatible to non-GPU place?



Best regards,
Krzysztof