Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/process_vm_access: pidfd and nowait support for process_vm_readv/writev

[David Laight]

On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:52:26 +0200
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>  
> >>  	/* Get process information */
> >> -	task = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid);
> >> +	if (flags & PROCESS_VM_PIDFD)
> >> +		task = pidfd_get_task(pid, &f_flags);
> >> +	else
> >> +		task = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid);
> >> +
> >>  	if (!task) {
> >>  		rc = -ESRCH;
> >>  		goto free_proc_pages;  
> > 
> > pidfd_get_task() returns ERR_PTR() on failure (e.g. ERR_PTR(-EBADF)),
> > but the code checks "if (!task)" which only catches NULL. An invalid
> > pidfd will cause mm_access() and put_task_struct() to dereference an
> > error pointer, crashing the kernel.  
> 
> Yes. Should we add proper selftests that exercise these code paths?
> 

Probably worth checking what happens when a 64bit process tries to
read high addresses of a 32bit process.

I remember trying to grok the way this code accessed the iov[] and
failing to find the appropriate access_ok() for the accesses to the
target process.

	David