Re: [PATCH] kernel: Change word in comment to a correct form to convey the meaning

[Bhaskar Chowdhury]

On 16:55 Sun 07 Jun 2026, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 04:07:19AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> > s/irreproducibly/irreproducible/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/context_tracking.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c
> > index a743e7ffa6c0..fda4ec211963 100644
> > --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c
> > +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c
> > @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ct_idle_exit);
> >   * If your architecture's idle loop does do upcalls to user mode (or does
> >   * anything else that results in unbalanced calls to the irq_enter() and
> >   * irq_exit() functions), RCU will give you what you deserve, good and hard.
> > - * But very infrequently and irreproducibly.
> > + * But very infrequently and irreproducible.
>
> OK, I will bite...  Don't both these words need to be in adverb form?
> What am I missing?
I think I missed the mark and misconceived. Sorry about the noise.

> 							Thanx, Paul
>
> >   *
> >   * Use things like work queues to work around this limitation.
> >   *
> > --
> > 2.53.0

--
Thanks,
Bhaskar

"Here's looking at you kid"-- Casablanca
https://about.me/unixbhaskar