Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: Sort pinctrl subnodes by pins

[Luca Weiss]

On Wed Jun 24, 2026 at 9:59 AM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6/22/26 9:05 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Mon Jun 15, 2026 at 2:09 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 6/12/26 3:46 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> On Fri Jun 12, 2026 at 2:59 PM CEST, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>>> As documented in the "Devicetree Sources (DTS) Coding Style" document,
>>>>> pinctrl subnodes should be sorted by the pins property. Do this once for
>>>>> kodiak.dtsi so that future additions can be added at the right places.
>>>>>
>>>>> No functional change intended, verified with dtx_diff.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi | 1382 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>>>   1 file changed, 691 insertions(+), 691 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi
>>>>> index fa540d8c2615..62daef726d32 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> +			qup_uart12_cts: qup-uart12-cts-state {
>>>>> +				pins = "gpio48";
>>>>> +				function = "qup14";
>>>>> +			};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			qup_uart12_rts: qup-uart12-rts-state {
>>>>> +				pins = "gpio49";
>>>>> +				function = "qup14";
>>>>> +			};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			qup_uart12_tx: qup-uart12-tx-state {
>>>>> +				pins = "gpio50";
>>>>> +				function = "qup14";
>>>>> +			};
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand and support the intention to keep this change non-functional,
>>>>> but this pad "gpio50" is for qup16 also, right?
>>>>
>>>> According to my QCM6490 data sheet, GPIO_50 has these functions:
>>>> * UART for qup14 (OK)
>>>> * SPI for qup14 (OK)
>>>> * SPI for qup16 (no pinctrl)
>>>
>>> "no pinctrl" meaning "not defined in the upstream dt as of today"?
>> 
>> Correct.
>> 
>>>>> Similarly pads "gpio54"/"gpio55" for qup14 function, "gpio62"/"gpio63"
>>>>> for qup16 function, I find all of these are missing on the original list.
>>>>
>>>> GPIO_54:
>>>> * UART qup15 (OK)
>>>> * SPI qup15 (OK)
>>>> * SPI qup14 (no pinctrl)
>>>>
>>>> GPIO_55:
>>>> * UART qup15 (OK)
>>>> * SPI qup15 (OK)
>>>> * SPI qup14 (no pinctrl)
>>>>
>>>> GPIO_62:
>>>> * UART qup17 (OK)
>>>> * SPI qup17 (OK)
>>>> * SPI qup16 (no pinctrl)
>>>>
>>>> GPIO_63:
>>>> * UART qup16 (?)
>>>> * SPI qup16 (lane 3) (?)
>>>> * SPI qup16 (lane 5) (?)
>>>>
>>>> But the GPIO_63 looks weird, is the data sheet wrong?! Where would
>>>> UART_RX of QUP1 SE7 go? Maybe it should be UART qup17 and SPI qup17 and
>>>> then SPI qup16 ??
>>>
>>> GPIO63:
>>>
>>> QUP1_SE6 SPI_CS2
>>> QUP1_SE7 UART_RX/SPI_CS0
>> 
>> That matches pinctrl driver and kodiak.dtsi at least. Still, the data
>> sheet is just wrong there. If you have any contact to relevant people
>> there, please let them know!
>
> Please share the 80-xxxx-xx number and I'll see what I can do

80-20659-1 Rev. AM

Regards
Luca