Re: [PATCH RFC v6 0/5] iio: add Open Sensor Fusion IIO driver

[Kim Jinseob]

Andy, you are right. I should have included the previous-version links in the
cover letter.

I also did not consistently track and answer all review comments across
revisions. I carried several comments into later revisions, but that was not
sufficient. I should have made sure every reviewer comment was either
addressed in the code or explicitly answered before posting the next revision.

Sorry for that.

For reference, the earlier public versions are:

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260520072843.3593-1-kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx

v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260524085312.15369-1-kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx

v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260529121005.1470-1-kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx

v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260607234343.22109-1-kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx

v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260616072242.3942-1-kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx

v6:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260628191337.937-1-kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx

David, understood. If the next revision is just asking for normal review and
I do not have specific open questions, I will drop the RFC tag. If I still
mark it RFC, I will state the specific questions clearly in the cover letter.

I will not post another revision until I have gone through the previous
review comments and made sure each one is either addressed in the code or
explicitly answered. I will also include the previous-version links in the
next cover letter.

Thanks

Jinseob


2026년 6월 30일 (화) 오전 12:25, David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
>
> On 6/28/26 2:13 PM, Jinseob Kim wrote:
> > Open Sensor Fusion (OSF) devices expose a UART/serdev host interface
> > for a sensor aggregation hub.  This RFC adds a Linux IIO driver that
> > parses OSF frames and creates IIO devices at runtime from capability
> > reports provided by the device firmware.
> >
> > When the corresponding capabilities are reported, the driver exposes
> > accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, and temperature data as IIO
> > devices named osf-accel, osf-gyro, osf-magn, and osf-temp.
> >
> > This remains RFC while the binding, protocol subset, runtime discovery
> > model, and driver-facing ABI are reviewed.
>
> If you are just looking for review and don't have specific questions,
> then it is time to drop the RFC.
>