Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] serial: 8250_aspeed_vuart: add VUART over PCI

From: Grégoire Layet

Date: Tue Jul 14 2026 - 02:34:17 EST


Hi Jiri,

On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 07:17, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08. 07. 26, 17:35, Grégoire Layet wrote:
> ...
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,26 @@
> > #define ASPEED_VUART_DEFAULT_SIRQ 4
> > #define ASPEED_VUART_DEFAULT_SIRQ_POLARITY IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> >
> > +#define ASPEED_SCU_SILICON_REVISION_ID 0x04
> > +#define AST2600A3_REVISION_ID 0x05030303
> > +
> > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24 0xC24
> > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_MASK GENMASK(11, 10)
> > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_PCIE2LPC_PCIDEV1 (0x2 << 10)
>
> So is this
> FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_MASK, 2)
> ?

Yes, replaced

>
> > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_HOST2BMC_EN BIT(18)
> > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_SCU560_EN BIT(17)
>
> Perhaps switch the two (to be in asc order)? And define 14 as _RESERVED
> as well?

Acknowledged. I have also removed the comment afterwards.

> > +#define ASPEED_SCU_PCIE_CONF_CTRL 0xC20
>
> Hmm, should these go before 0xC24?

Yes

Thanks for the feedback, I have made the changes for the next revision.

Regards,
Grégoire