Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] selftests/verification: Rearrange the wwnr_printk test

[Nam Cao]

Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The wwnr_printk test expects no reactions in some situations, after
> fixing the bash assertion, the test is failing because expecting no
> reaction after a previous step had reactions is flaky without making
> sure all buffers are flushed.
>
> Wait for reactions to be over when expected by polling dmesg for an
> interval without any rv message.
> Also simplify the load function to stop loads as soon as a reaction
> occurs, this limits the number of lines to flush and makes tests overall
> faster and more stable.
>
> Reviewed-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>