Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: renesas: Split out RZ/T2H CPG binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/07/2026 12:50, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 6:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
>>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Move the RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H clock controller bindings from the generic
>>> renesas,cpg-mssr.yaml schema into a dedicated binding.
>>>
>>> Unlike the traditional Renesas CPG/MSSR block, the RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H
>>> system controller integrates additional functionality beyond clock and
>>> module-stop control, including reset control, clock monitor support,
>>> write-protection registers and other system management features.
>>
>> Nothing of above differences got reflected in the code, so I do not
>> understand this reasoning. Binding is exactly the same as the old one.
>>
> A syscon regmap is implemented [0] as part of the RZ/T2H CPG driver.
> Since the RZ/T2H clock driver uses this syscon wrapper, a function
> pointer is implemented to handle the RZ/T2H-specific configuration.
> 
> Also, as the initial implementation used separate device tree nodes,
> Geert suggested splitting this binding schema off into a dedicated
> file [1].
> 

I still miss the difference. Can you point me (can be short diff) to
actual difference in this binding?

Best regards,
Krzysztof