Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: renesas: Split out RZ/T2H CPG binding

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2026 12:50, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 6:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> >>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Move the RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H clock controller bindings from the generic
> >>> renesas,cpg-mssr.yaml schema into a dedicated binding.
> >>>
> >>> Unlike the traditional Renesas CPG/MSSR block, the RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H
> >>> system controller integrates additional functionality beyond clock and
> >>> module-stop control, including reset control, clock monitor support,
> >>> write-protection registers and other system management features.
> >>
> >> Nothing of above differences got reflected in the code, so I do not
> >> understand this reasoning. Binding is exactly the same as the old one.
> >>
> > A syscon regmap is implemented [0] as part of the RZ/T2H CPG driver.
> > Since the RZ/T2H clock driver uses this syscon wrapper, a function
> > pointer is implemented to handle the RZ/T2H-specific configuration.
> >
> > Also, as the initial implementation used separate device tree nodes,
> > Geert suggested splitting this binding schema off into a dedicated
> > file [1].
> >
>
> I still miss the difference. Can you point me (can be short diff) to
> actual difference in this binding?
>
Fair enough! You're right that the schema text itself doesn't differ.
I'll drop this patch in v4 and leave the bindings in
renesas,cpg-mssr.yaml (unless Geert has a different opinion).

Cheers,
Prabhakar