RE: [PATCH net v3 2/3] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Improvement in buffer overflow handling

[Selvamani Rajagopal]

> 
> [High]
> Now that oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_end() returns int (and can return -EAGAIN
> via oa_tc6_update_rx_skb() when tail + size > end), should the
> "previous rx frame end + next rx frame start" branch also observe the
> return value? That branch is not shown in the diff, but in the
> resulting file it reads:
> 
> if (start_valid && end_valid && start_byte_offset > end_byte_offset) {


Andew and others,

I don't know why my v3 submission is under "Archived" flag. "state" is still new and I was waiting
for it to move to "Change requested" before submitting the next patch set. May be my understanding
is wrong.  Hope I can submit the following patch. 

FYI:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=&submitter=rajagopal&state=&q=&archive=true&delegate=

Sincerely
Selva